Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Permission

Permission
MCC Theatre
Lucille Lortel Theatre
June 6, 2015

Photo courtesy of MCC Theatre
Permission, MCC Theatre’s production of Robert Askins new play, did not deliver the bang I had expected.  Perhaps it was that Mr. Askins’ Hand to God was so ingenious that my hopes were too high.  Perhaps the performances lacked the timing and chemistry to deliver the laughs and punch the script deserved.  Perhaps the director did not have the insight to the deeper levels or rhythms of the script. Yes, to all of the above.

When Eric (Justin Bartha) and his wife Cynthia (Elizabeth Reaser) accidentally walk in on their friend Zach (Lucas Near-Verbrugghe) spanking his wife Michelle (Nicole Lowrence), they don’t know what to think.  They quickly exit the dinner party and plan not to speak of the incident.  Zach meets up with Eric the next day and explains that he spanks his wife for Jesus.  It is part of CDD (Christian Domestic Discipline) which, through the power of God, allows couples to become the best they can be.  Eric and Cynthia try it and, thanks to the grace of God, their lives become empowered and productive… until it all comes back to bite them in the ass (pun intended).

Photo courtesy of MCC Theatre
The first act is relatively short as the premise of the play is established.  Mr. Askins delivers an Act II with a few twists and reveals that make the play worthwhile.  Director Alex Timbers finds the timing in the final scene that builds the action to the point where the main couple, Eric and Cynthia, is able to take a realistic look at their relationship.  Unfortunately, that sharp timing was missing from the earlier parts of the show.

The set, designed by David Korins, transformed the small space at the Lucille Lortel Theatre into six different realistic locations.  Each set was quickly changed, revealed, and smoothly rolled downstage as David Weiner’s lighting and M. L. Dogg’s sound design kept the transitions delightful.  Well done gentlemen!

Photo courtesy of MCC Theatre
Robert Askins is a playwright who pushes the envelope.  It is possible that this is too strong a conclusion to draw since I have only seen two of his plays, but they both did that so well.  The dramatic question in Permission is about discipline, how far is too far, and who really holds the power.  Even though the driving forces behind the behavior in this play were not as deep and dark as in Hand to God, he is still the playwright to watch. 


Domenick Danza

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Music & Dance: Who Could Ask for Anything More?

An American in Paris
Palace Theatre
May 28, 2015

Photo courtesy of An American in Paris
Having spent a semester in Paris during the eighties, I am particularly enamored with all things Parisian.  I love the language, the food, the architecture, the historical places, and the art.   All of these things make me smile.  When I first heard that An American in Paris was coming to Broadway, I knew that I would imminently see the show. Because I am a movie enthusiast, I looked forward to seeing the musical rendition of this film.  Although Paris is just the setting of the show, the writer, Craig Lucas, manages to infuse some of the language and the culture of Paris into An American in Paris.  The musical is both directed and choreographed by Christopher Wheeldon, a former dancer for both the New York City Ballet and for the Royal Ballet.  This musical is his directorial debut.   The creative team includes: Robert Fisher, musical arranger, Bob Crowley, set and costume designer, Craig Lucas, the book's author, and Natasha Katz, lighting designer.  The principal actors are Robert Fairchild, who plays Jerry Mulligan, the American, and Leanne Cope, who plays Lise Dassin, the woman he loves.  Having received twelve Tony nominations this season, An American in Paris is one of the forerunners for best musical.  In the musical, the dancers leap and move flawlessly, holding the attention of the audience as it waits to see whether the dancers will land dynamically with precision.  They leap over furniture and dance in tandem to music by George and Ira Gershwin.  After careful reflection, I wondered what was most important in a musical. Was it the music, the acting, the dancing, or the story?  Does a theater-goer go to the theater to see the creative set design, the lighting, or the audio?  Do the traditional conventions of theater matter?  I have come to the conclusion that normally a great well-defined story is essential, but if there are other great strong creative elements, then the musical may be catapulted to even greater heights.

Leanne Cope & Robert Fairchild
Photo courtesy of An American in Paris
Charles Isherwood of the New York Times said that this musical is typical of Broadway musicals.  This comment was not pejorative, but intended to show that it maintains the typical structure of Broadway musicals.  I disagree; it is atypical.  I believe that there is significantly less singing (not less music) than in traditional musicals and the story is less defined.  The acting is mostly encompassed within the dance compositions.  At the inception of this performance, I was disappointed, because I was accustomed to a traditional musical with a more well-defined plot and more intense acting and singing.  I, however in the end, came to see this musical as levels above a traditional musical, for the dancing and the choreography of this show are veritably unparalleled. The costumes for the dancers and for the prima dancer are exquisite.  Although the story is less developed in the first half, it becomes more defined during the second half.  After intermission, the action and the tempo rise in the musical to a pace that allows the audience to become captivated by the arrangement of Gershwin's music and by both the dance and choreography.  The story becomes sharper as the dancers leap in gran jetĂ© fashion into the air and over props, further enthralling the audience and causing the viewers to applaud and say bravo at the end of the performance.  The dancers seamlessly integrate dance with music within the choreography with contemporary and jazz vernacular.

Photo courtesy of An American in Paris
An American in Paris is the story of an American soldier, Jerry Mulligan, who decides to stay in Paris after the Great War so that he can become a painter.  He meets Lise Dessin, a Jewish woman, who was hidden by a French family during the war.  He soon realizes that he is not the only one trying to woo her.  She feels, however, an allegiance to the French family, especially the son, Henri, expertly played by Max Von Essen.  Lise is an accomplished ballerina and she works to hone her craft so that she can perform adroitly in a performance.  The story is about love and internal conflict.  This story is about staying true to oneself and about reconciling conflict so that true love prevails.

This musical is all about the dancing, the choreography, and the music that make this show a stunning
Photo courtesy of An American in Paris
success, not the story.  It has the audience wanting more at the end.  The dancers demonstrated a variety of movements including pirouettes as they use props when leaping perfectly in such a way that one's eyes remain focused on all of the movements.  The chemistry between Robert Fairchild and Leanne Cope is strong and it keeps the audience hoping that they will work through their conflict so that they can be together.
 The dancers light up this show with their bright resplendent costumes.  Toward the end of the performance, all of the dancers line up across the stage and do a number similar to the Radio City Rockettes.  At the end, both the dancers and the singers reprise the song, "I Got Rhythm," and sing, "Who could ask for anything more?"  Indeed, I asked myself, who could ask for anything more?

Sunday evening, June 7th, is the Tony Awards.  I look forward with great expectation to seeing this musical and Something Rotten, two of my favorite musicals this year, take top honors.  I admit that my ticket to The King and I is after the Tony Awards; thus, I cannot comment on whether it will take some top honors as well.  Enjoy the awards and let's start a conversation.








     
Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Guest Contributor

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

The Spoils

The Spoils
The New Group
The Pershing Square Signature Center
May 31, 2015

Photo courtesy of The New Group
When I saw the listing on TDF for The Spoils, written by and starring Jesse Eisenberg (The Social Network) and co-starring Kunal Nayyar (The Big Bang Theory), I knew I had to see it.  The play far exceeds any expectations that the advertised names create.  The script is intriguing and challenging.  The characters are full, real and complex.  The relationships are genuine, compelling and relatable.  The world of this play rings true on a personal level as well as holds strong relevance on a broader scale.  

In the opening scene, Kalyan (Kunal Nayyar) asks his girlfriend, Reshma (Annapurna Sriram) if she thinks it is better to tell someone a truth that will hurt their feelings and possibly destroy what they have that is going smoothly in their life, or leave well enough alone by withholding information.  As a playwright, Jesse Eisenberg explores this concept when the main character, Ben, who he portrays, does just that to the people to whom he is closely connected.  The term “closely connected” refers to Ben’s roommate Kalyan, his girlfriend Reshma, Ben’s grade school crush Sarah (Erin Darke), and her fiancĂ© Ted (Michael Zegen).  Since Ben has managed to alienate himself from all social, professional, and creative contacts (he considers himself a filmmaker), these four characters are not necessarily defined by this term within his isolated existence.   It gets ugly and uncomfortable when Ben starts revealing some “truths” he has kept to himself.  What exactly is the truth and what purpose does it serve anyway? 

Jesse Eisenberg and Kunal Nayyar in The Spoils
Photo courtesy of The New Group

Scott Elliot’s directing is superb.  The two and a half hour play is tight and controlled.  Each of the five cast members is excellent.  They create authentic and realistic relationships based on genuine emotion, whether it’s compassion, generosity, jealousy, love, lust, loathing, or any strange and complex combination.  The depths of the characters are revealed throughout the play, but not fully exposed until the last moments.  Thank you Jesse Eisenberg for this prolific, unpredictable, and riveting journey of a play.

Michael Zegen, Jesse Eisenberg and Erin Darke in The Spoils
Phots courtesy of The New Group
On a personal note:  In the second act, Kalyan tells Ben about a job interview he went on which was unpleasant and humiliating.  His possible future employer berated his comments so that he felt like everything he said was the wrong answer.  Kalyan’s qualifications, education, and intelligence are clearly built up throughout the play.  The integrity of his interviewer is clearly questionable in the way he tells the story.  I had a similar experience last week.  Kalyan only had Ben to turn to, who filled up his head with “truths” that magnified the point of view of his interviewer.  Ben then continues to tear down Kalyan and illustrates how he created the alienated situation he thrives on.  I, on the other hand, was lucky enough to immediately call my friend Julia who gave me a more positive perspective.  A few questions come to mind:  Which “truth” is real?  Is it the one that serves you and keeps you moving forward with verve and self-confidence?  Or, is it the one that the person in power holds over you?  This brings up the basis of Ben and Kalyan’s relationship.  Ben kicks Kalyan when he is down in order to lift himself up.  Which “truth” is best for Ben and Kalyan to face? Will “truths” that Kalyan holds back from Ben affect him as deeply as the ones Ben reveals to Kalyan?  Does the question Kalyan asks in the opening of the play have a different answer based on the circumstances?  

Go see The New Group’s production of Jesse Eisenberg’s The Spoils at The Pershing Square Signature Center.  It runs through June 28.  The truth is… you’re gonna love it! 
 
 Domenick Danza

Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Guards at the Taj

Guards at the Taj
Atlantic Theater Company
Linda Gross Theater
May 24, 2015

Photo courtesy of Atlantic Theater Company
Can there be only one most beautiful thing in the world?  Can the creation of beauty become extinct?  What is beauty?  These are some of the thematic questions addressed by playwright Rajiv Joseph in Guards at the Taj now playing at Atlantic Theater Company.  This play will make you laugh, and cringe… and ponder beauty.

Humayun and Babur, two of the Emperor’s guards at the Taj Mahal in 1648, are among the first to see the newly completed mausoleum at first light.  They behold this MOST beautiful creation, a monument never to be exceeded in beauty.  They then journey to a blood drenched dungeon, where they face their darkest nightmare and come out with different appreciations of the truth.  Omar Metwally (Humayun) and Arian Moayed (Babur) each develops a unique and realistic character.  Together they create a relatable bond of friendship and adventure.

Arian Moayed, Rajiv Joseph, & Omar Metwally
at the Taj Mahal (Agra, India)
Photo courtesy of Atlantic Theater Company

The script by Rajiv Joseph, well known for his BengalTiger at the Baghdad Zoo (a 2010 finalist for the Pulitzer Prize), spans a broad range of topic as it focuses in on its main theme (the essence and creation of beauty) through the heartfelt comradery of the two characters.  It is profoundly, yet simply, directed by Amy Morton. 

The set is a brutal structure that weighs heavily on the space.  Ingeniously designed by Timothy R. Mackabee, it is realistic, powerful, and alive.  The moments of beauty the script refers to are illuminated by David Weiner’s amazing lighting.  The brightness contrasts the heaviness of the set to create spectacular moments that stand out in the characters’ perspectives.

Guards at the Taj runs through June 28 at Atlantic Theater Company’s Linda Gross Theater.  Put your thinking cap on and ponder the beauty of this piece of theatre.


Domenick Danza

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

The Glass Menagerie

The Glass Menagerie
Masterworks Theater Company
Off Broadway - 47th Street Theater
May 16, 2015

Photo courtesy of
Masterworks Theater Company
MasterworksTheater Company, in the first production of their inaugural season, has mounted Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie.  Director Christopher Scott found the rhythm, poeticism, and soul of Tennessee Williams.  The cast brings to life these well-known characters with vivacity, charm, and inner conflict.  This production encapsulates the depth and complexity of this Tennessee Williams’ classic script.

I saw last season’s Broadway production of The Glass Menagerie with Cherry Jones and Zachary Quinto.  It was breathtaking and mesmerizing.  It did, however, lack one important element, and that was the disdain that Tom feels towards his mother that drives him to desert Laura.  Richard Prioleau’s Tom, in Masterwork’s production, portrays that visceral element with clarity and verve.  Saundra Santiago’s Amanda has a mother’s determination and the Southern gift of gab that pushed every button in her son’s emotional armor.  Together these two actors set the stage on fire. 

Saundra Santiago as Amanda, Doug Harris as Jim, Richard Prioleau as Tom
Photo courtesy of Masterworks Theater Company

Olivia Washington portrays Laura with the emotional disability that the character’s being "crippled" represents.  Doug Harris gives Jim, the Gentleman Caller, the conservative façade and shallow respect that lures Laura out in the open.  Together they are magic.

The scenic design, by Campbell Baird, is simple and effective.  Lighting design, by Joyce Liao, and original music and sound design, by Brett Macias, satiates a very small stage with larger than life moments.

Saundra Santiago as Amanda & Richard Prioleau as Tom
Photo courtesy of Masterworks Theater Company
Masterworks Theater Company is dedicated to producing “great plays and musicals that every young person should have an opportunity to see.”  Their intention is to “present these high quality productions at reasonable prices for schools, colleges, and families.”  With this show as an example of what is to come, I have very high expectations and look forward to their upcoming A Midsummer Night’s Dream in June.

The Glass Menagerie plays Off Broadway at the 47th Street Theater through May 30.  Go see it and experience the true essence of Tennessee Williams.  

Domenick Danza

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

The Two Gentlemen of Verona

Fiasco Theater’s
The Two Gentlemen of Verona
Theatre for a New Audience
April 25, & May 7, 2015

Deirdre M. DeLoatch and I went to see Fiasco Theatre’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona at Theatre for a New Audience a week apart.  We decided to share our thoughts on the show together.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theatre

Deirdre:  After seeing many Shakespearean tragedies over the last year, I looked forward to watching one of his comedies.  I enjoyed a recent performance of Hamlet and A Winter's Tale considerably more than The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  Considering the script, this contemporary performance adds both another dimension and depth to the play via props, costumes, set design, and lighting that helps the audience view the play in a contemporary manner instead of fostering nostalgia for the Elizabethan era.

Domenick:  The breakdown of the script and the consolidation of the cast to a solid, strong ensemble of six actors created a flowing, comprehensive, and pleasant two hours.  The directors, Jessie Austrian and Ben Steinfeld, clearly have a strong knowledge of Shakespeare and insight into the story lines and themes of this comic love story.  They found the heart of The Two Gentlemen of Verona and interpreted it with delight and care.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Synopsis (from Deirdre):  Shakespeare's The Two Gentlemen of Verona, a romantic comedy and purportedly Shakespeare's first play, is the story of love, friendship, and betrayal.  Valentine is in love with the lovely Sylvia; his best friend from Childhood, Proteus, is in love with Julia. Proteus, upon meeting Sylvia at the Duke's Court immediately surreptitiously professes his love for her, although he heretofore professed his love for Julia.  Proteus is aware that he is betraying his best friend but he decides to woo Sylvia in spite of behaving duplicitously.  Sylvia, however, has been betrothed to Thurio, a suitor for whom she has no interest.  Julia disguises herself as a man, so that she can reunite with Proteus.  She eavesdrops on Proteus's conversations to find out information about Proteus and Silvia.  Valentine is banished by Silvia's father, the Duke, preventing his love for Silvia from prospering.  During his banishment, he continues to pine for Sylvia, as Proteus desires to plot and scheme to get Sylvia.  In the end, Proteus and Julia salvage their relationship and profess their love; Similarly, Valentine and Sylvia, with the blessing of her father, join together in love, as he realizes that Thurio does not have the depth of character as Valentine.

Deirdre:  This fine youthful ensemble cast adds to the success of the play.  When one thinks of marriage, youthfulness is usually apparent.  Many of the characters play multiple roles that allow us to see the professional skill of the actors playing varied and distinguished characters.  Before the play starts, the cast is on stage jovially playing with each other and engaging in conversations about the lighting and how they will look on stage.  It is obvious that they all work well together.

Domenick:  I agree.  The ensemble was fabulous.  They were skillful and fun and worked together seamlessly bringing joy and passion to every moment.  

Deirdre:  Zachary Fine plays both Valentine and Crab, the dog.  His emotions are somewhat melodramatic especially when he is banished and he is not able to see his beloved Sylvia.  That scene seems to be cloying with extreme sentimentality. The love that he has for her is affective to the extent that the audience feels his emotions, which move us to empathy.  

Zachary Fine as Crab & Andy Grotelueschen as Launce
Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Domenick:  The characterization and interactions of Crab, the dog, were fun and charming.  Mentioning this first by no means takes away from Zachary Fine’s performance in his primary role of Valentine.  The scenes with Crab added just the right amount of fun and frivolity to the mood of the production.

Deirdre:  Noah Brody, as Proteus, illustrated the character well for we see how Proteus is a cad because he allows us to see his own reflective thoughts aptly about his dishonorable actions. 

Domenick:  Jessie Austrian was charming and feisty as Julia.  Her ability to color and shade her monologues with tactics that clarified the text and engaged the audience was skillful and entertaining.

Emily Young as Sylvia & Jessie Austrian as Julia
Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Deirdre:  Emily Young is adorable as Sylvia. Her pulchritude is evident.  We can see why Valentine loves her and why Proteus has fallen for her as well.  She is lovely with her beautiful white dress (symbolizing her purity) and exquisite beauty.  The deep love that Valentine and Sylvia have for each other is evident and can be seen through the great chemistry that is depicted throughout the play.  The characters exhibit great emotion when their reflection, passion, and despair are all needed to match the events in the play.

Domenick:  Andy Grotelueschen played three roles (Launce, the Duke, and Antonia).  The differentiation of his roles was clear and sharp.  His Antonio was especially witty and charming.

Deirdre:  The set, designed by Derek McLane, is not elaborate but its simplicity adds to its simple elegance.  

Domenick:  I agree.  I found it whimsical, light, and fun.  It was sheets of paper, crumpled and flat, in a mosaic collogue along the upstage, stage right, and stage left walls.  It also draped from the ceiling.  The white of the paper reflected the color of the lights as the scenes, moods, and time shifted.  The sheets of paper were representative of how many love letters were sent throughout the play, and connected to the sentiment in the closing line of how sharing a story reveals how you are through the writing.

Deirdre:  The red paper on which one letter is written in Act II is fabulous when it is torn to pieces.  It is as if Valentine's heart is bleeding from over sentimentality.  When each piece hits the stage with great lighting punctuating both the love that he is feeling and the hurt by his inability to consummate his relationship by marrying Sylvia.  Lighting, designed by Tim Cryan, is also used as a way of changing the color of the crepe paper on the set.

Domenick:  The second act had a lot more hutzpah than the first.  The action rose and the energy excelled as the plot became full of intrigue.  My favorite scene was in the forest in Act II when Sylvia confronts Proteus and confesses her love for Valentine.  Valentine forgives Proteus for acting like an untrustworthy fool, and Julia reveals herself from behind her disguise.  It all came together in a high point of action and enthusiasm. 

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Deirdre:  Although, this play is not my favorite and the story lacks both the power and intrigue of Shakespeare's tragedies, the modernization of this rendition helps one place himself into the lives of the characters who are similar to youthful romantic couples of today.  The set is minimalist; but the acting is great.  The whimsical nature of the play makes the audience to both chuckle and smile and subsequently say, “Bravo.”  Thus, in spite of a nearby audience member's exclamation, “I had forgotten how dumb this play actually was,” I actually enjoyed it for the comedy in which it was intended.  Although not as stimulating as Hamlet or Macbeth, it is no less worthy of great commendation for the direction it was given by the creative team and for the talented cast that delivered a great performance.

Domenick:  I truly enjoyed The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  This was my first time experiencing a Fiasco Theatre production.  They have a list of credits to their name from the past few seasons including Into the Woods at Roundabout Theatre.  I intend to make a point to see more of their work in the future.  The level of quality is very high. 

Deirdre:  I saw the Fiasco's production of Into the Woods at the Roundabout Theater.  The acting was vigorous which brought the drama to great height.  After seeing the production, I ordered the music from the original production with Bernadette Peters because I wanted to stay connected to Stephen Sondheim's music.  Seeing that production was the impetus for seeing the Fiasco's production of The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  I knew that their rendition of this work would be excellent.

Domenick:  I love the space at Theatre for a New Audience.  The classic theatre design allows every seat to have a great view of the performance space, even the higher up, less expensive seats.   They are producing great theatre in downtown Brooklyn at reasonable ticket prices.  Get there early, like I do, and enjoy a snack in the lobby cafĂ© before the performance.

Deirdre:  I am looking forward to The Public Theater's Performance of The Tempest and Cymbeline (I've neither read nor seen Cymbeline) at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park.  I hope that they will be just as ebullient with vivacity as The Two Gentlemen of Verona.

Domenick:   The Drilling Company is also producing The Two Gentlemen of Verona in association with Bryant Park from May15 – 31 on the Upper Terrace.  The performances are FREE, Fridays and Saturdays at 6:30 PM, and Sundays at 2:00 PM.  Knowing the quality of the Drilling Company, this is sure to be a great production as well.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater

Fiasco Theater’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona runs until May 25 at Theatre for a New Audience in Brooklyn (across the street from BAM).  Go to see it before it closes.  Add to the conversation Deirdre and I started here by writing your comments about this or any other upcoming Shakespeare productions in the city. 

Domenick Danza

Deirdre M. DeLoatch

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Ethel Barrymore Theatre
May 1, 2015

Photo courtesy of
The Curious Incident of the Dog
in the Night-Time
I finally saw The Curious Incident of theDog in the Night-Time.  The experience of the production far exceeded every great comment I’ve heard.  Yes, the technology is amazing, the directing is skillful and daring, and the acting is on point and authentic.  The effectiveness of the concept far exceeds any rave review, high recommendation, or Tony nomination.  The show needs to be experienced to be fully appreciated. 

Part way through the first act I realized that I was observing the play; somewhat detached while still engaged.  I was carefully watching the changing lights and movement of the props.  I was calculating the level of the relationships.  I was not emotionally connected to the characters, nor did the conflict move me or drive me to react.  Yet, when the first act ended and the house lights came up, I was stunned.  I didn’t want to move.  I needed to think through what had just happened.  I realized the depth of my engagement in the show was more intellectual and analytical than it was emotional.  This is the way the main character, Christopher, a fifteen year old with an autistic spectrum condition (exceptionally played by Alex Sharp), experiences his world.  This is the genius of the production.  The technology (set, lights, video, and sound) is brilliantly designed to give you the main character’s perspective.  All the other characters are directed through the lense of his point of view.

Photo courtesy of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

Understanding this allowed me to dive into the second act with enthusiasm.  It was a roller coaster ride as Christopher traveled alone on a train from his home with his father to live with his mother in London.  Once out of his comfort zone and routine, his senses became overwhelmed, and so did mine.  I found myself experiencing his journey of solving the murder of his neighbor’s dog with unstoppable resolve.  There was no fear and no emotional frenzy as deep family secrets were uncovered.  Each conflict and obstacle were treated with blind determination that made each conflict and obstacle just another stumbling block to move past. 

I was warned not to leave after the curtain call, and purposefully not told why.  I give you the same advice if you have not seen the show, but with some insight.  There was a mention during the second act that there would be an explanation for a math problem after the curtain call.  When the character of Christopher articulates his solution, it encapsulated the way he sees the world and the way the technology of the show are the workings of his mind.  This section of the show encompasses the journey of the play.

Photo courtesy of
The Curious incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Director Marianne Elliott has created a unique theatrical experience with depth and insight.  The designer team of Bunny Christie (scenic and costume), Paule Constable (lighting) Finn Ross (video), and Ian Dickinson (sound) have created the inner workings of the mind of a person on the autism spectrum.  You will love Alex Sharp as Christopher.  He is endearing and genuine.  And nothing I or anyone else says can match the experience of this production.  See it through the eye of Christopher yourself.  Take the journey.

Domenick Danza