Wednesday, May 27, 2015

Guards at the Taj

Guards at the Taj
Atlantic Theater Company
Linda Gross Theater
May 24, 2015

Photo courtesy of Atlantic Theater Company
Can there be only one most beautiful thing in the world?  Can the creation of beauty become extinct?  What is beauty?  These are some of the thematic questions addressed by playwright Rajiv Joseph in Guards at the Taj now playing at Atlantic Theater Company.  This play will make you laugh, and cringe… and ponder beauty.

Humayun and Babur, two of the Emperor’s guards at the Taj Mahal in 1648, are among the first to see the newly completed mausoleum at first light.  They behold this MOST beautiful creation, a monument never to be exceeded in beauty.  They then journey to a blood drenched dungeon, where they face their darkest nightmare and come out with different appreciations of the truth.  Omar Metwally (Humayun) and Arian Moayed (Babur) each develops a unique and realistic character.  Together they create a relatable bond of friendship and adventure.

Arian Moayed, Rajiv Joseph, & Omar Metwally
at the Taj Mahal (Agra, India)
Photo courtesy of Atlantic Theater Company

The script by Rajiv Joseph, well known for his BengalTiger at the Baghdad Zoo (a 2010 finalist for the Pulitzer Prize), spans a broad range of topic as it focuses in on its main theme (the essence and creation of beauty) through the heartfelt comradery of the two characters.  It is profoundly, yet simply, directed by Amy Morton. 

The set is a brutal structure that weighs heavily on the space.  Ingeniously designed by Timothy R. Mackabee, it is realistic, powerful, and alive.  The moments of beauty the script refers to are illuminated by David Weiner’s amazing lighting.  The brightness contrasts the heaviness of the set to create spectacular moments that stand out in the characters’ perspectives.

Guards at the Taj runs through June 28 at Atlantic Theater Company’s Linda Gross Theater.  Put your thinking cap on and ponder the beauty of this piece of theatre.


Domenick Danza

Tuesday, May 19, 2015

The Glass Menagerie

The Glass Menagerie
Masterworks Theater Company
Off Broadway - 47th Street Theater
May 16, 2015

Photo courtesy of
Masterworks Theater Company
MasterworksTheater Company, in the first production of their inaugural season, has mounted Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie.  Director Christopher Scott found the rhythm, poeticism, and soul of Tennessee Williams.  The cast brings to life these well-known characters with vivacity, charm, and inner conflict.  This production encapsulates the depth and complexity of this Tennessee Williams’ classic script.

I saw last season’s Broadway production of The Glass Menagerie with Cherry Jones and Zachary Quinto.  It was breathtaking and mesmerizing.  It did, however, lack one important element, and that was the disdain that Tom feels towards his mother that drives him to desert Laura.  Richard Prioleau’s Tom, in Masterwork’s production, portrays that visceral element with clarity and verve.  Saundra Santiago’s Amanda has a mother’s determination and the Southern gift of gab that pushed every button in her son’s emotional armor.  Together these two actors set the stage on fire. 

Saundra Santiago as Amanda, Doug Harris as Jim, Richard Prioleau as Tom
Photo courtesy of Masterworks Theater Company

Olivia Washington portrays Laura with the emotional disability that the character’s being "crippled" represents.  Doug Harris gives Jim, the Gentleman Caller, the conservative façade and shallow respect that lures Laura out in the open.  Together they are magic.

The scenic design, by Campbell Baird, is simple and effective.  Lighting design, by Joyce Liao, and original music and sound design, by Brett Macias, satiates a very small stage with larger than life moments.

Saundra Santiago as Amanda & Richard Prioleau as Tom
Photo courtesy of Masterworks Theater Company
Masterworks Theater Company is dedicated to producing “great plays and musicals that every young person should have an opportunity to see.”  Their intention is to “present these high quality productions at reasonable prices for schools, colleges, and families.”  With this show as an example of what is to come, I have very high expectations and look forward to their upcoming A Midsummer Night’s Dream in June.

The Glass Menagerie plays Off Broadway at the 47th Street Theater through May 30.  Go see it and experience the true essence of Tennessee Williams.  

Domenick Danza

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

The Two Gentlemen of Verona

Fiasco Theater’s
The Two Gentlemen of Verona
Theatre for a New Audience
April 25, & May 7, 2015

Deirdre M. DeLoatch and I went to see Fiasco Theatre’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona at Theatre for a New Audience a week apart.  We decided to share our thoughts on the show together.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theatre

Deirdre:  After seeing many Shakespearean tragedies over the last year, I looked forward to watching one of his comedies.  I enjoyed a recent performance of Hamlet and A Winter's Tale considerably more than The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  Considering the script, this contemporary performance adds both another dimension and depth to the play via props, costumes, set design, and lighting that helps the audience view the play in a contemporary manner instead of fostering nostalgia for the Elizabethan era.

Domenick:  The breakdown of the script and the consolidation of the cast to a solid, strong ensemble of six actors created a flowing, comprehensive, and pleasant two hours.  The directors, Jessie Austrian and Ben Steinfeld, clearly have a strong knowledge of Shakespeare and insight into the story lines and themes of this comic love story.  They found the heart of The Two Gentlemen of Verona and interpreted it with delight and care.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Synopsis (from Deirdre):  Shakespeare's The Two Gentlemen of Verona, a romantic comedy and purportedly Shakespeare's first play, is the story of love, friendship, and betrayal.  Valentine is in love with the lovely Sylvia; his best friend from Childhood, Proteus, is in love with Julia. Proteus, upon meeting Sylvia at the Duke's Court immediately surreptitiously professes his love for her, although he heretofore professed his love for Julia.  Proteus is aware that he is betraying his best friend but he decides to woo Sylvia in spite of behaving duplicitously.  Sylvia, however, has been betrothed to Thurio, a suitor for whom she has no interest.  Julia disguises herself as a man, so that she can reunite with Proteus.  She eavesdrops on Proteus's conversations to find out information about Proteus and Silvia.  Valentine is banished by Silvia's father, the Duke, preventing his love for Silvia from prospering.  During his banishment, he continues to pine for Sylvia, as Proteus desires to plot and scheme to get Sylvia.  In the end, Proteus and Julia salvage their relationship and profess their love; Similarly, Valentine and Sylvia, with the blessing of her father, join together in love, as he realizes that Thurio does not have the depth of character as Valentine.

Deirdre:  This fine youthful ensemble cast adds to the success of the play.  When one thinks of marriage, youthfulness is usually apparent.  Many of the characters play multiple roles that allow us to see the professional skill of the actors playing varied and distinguished characters.  Before the play starts, the cast is on stage jovially playing with each other and engaging in conversations about the lighting and how they will look on stage.  It is obvious that they all work well together.

Domenick:  I agree.  The ensemble was fabulous.  They were skillful and fun and worked together seamlessly bringing joy and passion to every moment.  

Deirdre:  Zachary Fine plays both Valentine and Crab, the dog.  His emotions are somewhat melodramatic especially when he is banished and he is not able to see his beloved Sylvia.  That scene seems to be cloying with extreme sentimentality. The love that he has for her is affective to the extent that the audience feels his emotions, which move us to empathy.  

Zachary Fine as Crab & Andy Grotelueschen as Launce
Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Domenick:  The characterization and interactions of Crab, the dog, were fun and charming.  Mentioning this first by no means takes away from Zachary Fine’s performance in his primary role of Valentine.  The scenes with Crab added just the right amount of fun and frivolity to the mood of the production.

Deirdre:  Noah Brody, as Proteus, illustrated the character well for we see how Proteus is a cad because he allows us to see his own reflective thoughts aptly about his dishonorable actions. 

Domenick:  Jessie Austrian was charming and feisty as Julia.  Her ability to color and shade her monologues with tactics that clarified the text and engaged the audience was skillful and entertaining.

Emily Young as Sylvia & Jessie Austrian as Julia
Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Deirdre:  Emily Young is adorable as Sylvia. Her pulchritude is evident.  We can see why Valentine loves her and why Proteus has fallen for her as well.  She is lovely with her beautiful white dress (symbolizing her purity) and exquisite beauty.  The deep love that Valentine and Sylvia have for each other is evident and can be seen through the great chemistry that is depicted throughout the play.  The characters exhibit great emotion when their reflection, passion, and despair are all needed to match the events in the play.

Domenick:  Andy Grotelueschen played three roles (Launce, the Duke, and Antonia).  The differentiation of his roles was clear and sharp.  His Antonio was especially witty and charming.

Deirdre:  The set, designed by Derek McLane, is not elaborate but its simplicity adds to its simple elegance.  

Domenick:  I agree.  I found it whimsical, light, and fun.  It was sheets of paper, crumpled and flat, in a mosaic collogue along the upstage, stage right, and stage left walls.  It also draped from the ceiling.  The white of the paper reflected the color of the lights as the scenes, moods, and time shifted.  The sheets of paper were representative of how many love letters were sent throughout the play, and connected to the sentiment in the closing line of how sharing a story reveals how you are through the writing.

Deirdre:  The red paper on which one letter is written in Act II is fabulous when it is torn to pieces.  It is as if Valentine's heart is bleeding from over sentimentality.  When each piece hits the stage with great lighting punctuating both the love that he is feeling and the hurt by his inability to consummate his relationship by marrying Sylvia.  Lighting, designed by Tim Cryan, is also used as a way of changing the color of the crepe paper on the set.

Domenick:  The second act had a lot more hutzpah than the first.  The action rose and the energy excelled as the plot became full of intrigue.  My favorite scene was in the forest in Act II when Sylvia confronts Proteus and confesses her love for Valentine.  Valentine forgives Proteus for acting like an untrustworthy fool, and Julia reveals herself from behind her disguise.  It all came together in a high point of action and enthusiasm. 

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater
Deirdre:  Although, this play is not my favorite and the story lacks both the power and intrigue of Shakespeare's tragedies, the modernization of this rendition helps one place himself into the lives of the characters who are similar to youthful romantic couples of today.  The set is minimalist; but the acting is great.  The whimsical nature of the play makes the audience to both chuckle and smile and subsequently say, “Bravo.”  Thus, in spite of a nearby audience member's exclamation, “I had forgotten how dumb this play actually was,” I actually enjoyed it for the comedy in which it was intended.  Although not as stimulating as Hamlet or Macbeth, it is no less worthy of great commendation for the direction it was given by the creative team and for the talented cast that delivered a great performance.

Domenick:  I truly enjoyed The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  This was my first time experiencing a Fiasco Theatre production.  They have a list of credits to their name from the past few seasons including Into the Woods at Roundabout Theatre.  I intend to make a point to see more of their work in the future.  The level of quality is very high. 

Deirdre:  I saw the Fiasco's production of Into the Woods at the Roundabout Theater.  The acting was vigorous which brought the drama to great height.  After seeing the production, I ordered the music from the original production with Bernadette Peters because I wanted to stay connected to Stephen Sondheim's music.  Seeing that production was the impetus for seeing the Fiasco's production of The Two Gentlemen of Verona.  I knew that their rendition of this work would be excellent.

Domenick:  I love the space at Theatre for a New Audience.  The classic theatre design allows every seat to have a great view of the performance space, even the higher up, less expensive seats.   They are producing great theatre in downtown Brooklyn at reasonable ticket prices.  Get there early, like I do, and enjoy a snack in the lobby café before the performance.

Deirdre:  I am looking forward to The Public Theater's Performance of The Tempest and Cymbeline (I've neither read nor seen Cymbeline) at the Delacorte Theater in Central Park.  I hope that they will be just as ebullient with vivacity as The Two Gentlemen of Verona.

Domenick:   The Drilling Company is also producing The Two Gentlemen of Verona in association with Bryant Park from May15 – 31 on the Upper Terrace.  The performances are FREE, Fridays and Saturdays at 6:30 PM, and Sundays at 2:00 PM.  Knowing the quality of the Drilling Company, this is sure to be a great production as well.

Photo courtesy of Fiasco Theater

Fiasco Theater’s The Two Gentlemen of Verona runs until May 25 at Theatre for a New Audience in Brooklyn (across the street from BAM).  Go to see it before it closes.  Add to the conversation Deirdre and I started here by writing your comments about this or any other upcoming Shakespeare productions in the city. 

Domenick Danza

Deirdre M. DeLoatch

Tuesday, May 5, 2015

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Ethel Barrymore Theatre
May 1, 2015

Photo courtesy of
The Curious Incident of the Dog
in the Night-Time
I finally saw The Curious Incident of theDog in the Night-Time.  The experience of the production far exceeded every great comment I’ve heard.  Yes, the technology is amazing, the directing is skillful and daring, and the acting is on point and authentic.  The effectiveness of the concept far exceeds any rave review, high recommendation, or Tony nomination.  The show needs to be experienced to be fully appreciated. 

Part way through the first act I realized that I was observing the play; somewhat detached while still engaged.  I was carefully watching the changing lights and movement of the props.  I was calculating the level of the relationships.  I was not emotionally connected to the characters, nor did the conflict move me or drive me to react.  Yet, when the first act ended and the house lights came up, I was stunned.  I didn’t want to move.  I needed to think through what had just happened.  I realized the depth of my engagement in the show was more intellectual and analytical than it was emotional.  This is the way the main character, Christopher, a fifteen year old with an autistic spectrum condition (exceptionally played by Alex Sharp), experiences his world.  This is the genius of the production.  The technology (set, lights, video, and sound) is brilliantly designed to give you the main character’s perspective.  All the other characters are directed through the lense of his point of view.

Photo courtesy of The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time

Understanding this allowed me to dive into the second act with enthusiasm.  It was a roller coaster ride as Christopher traveled alone on a train from his home with his father to live with his mother in London.  Once out of his comfort zone and routine, his senses became overwhelmed, and so did mine.  I found myself experiencing his journey of solving the murder of his neighbor’s dog with unstoppable resolve.  There was no fear and no emotional frenzy as deep family secrets were uncovered.  Each conflict and obstacle were treated with blind determination that made each conflict and obstacle just another stumbling block to move past. 

I was warned not to leave after the curtain call, and purposefully not told why.  I give you the same advice if you have not seen the show, but with some insight.  There was a mention during the second act that there would be an explanation for a math problem after the curtain call.  When the character of Christopher articulates his solution, it encapsulated the way he sees the world and the way the technology of the show are the workings of his mind.  This section of the show encompasses the journey of the play.

Photo courtesy of
The Curious incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
Director Marianne Elliott has created a unique theatrical experience with depth and insight.  The designer team of Bunny Christie (scenic and costume), Paule Constable (lighting) Finn Ross (video), and Ian Dickinson (sound) have created the inner workings of the mind of a person on the autism spectrum.  You will love Alex Sharp as Christopher.  He is endearing and genuine.  And nothing I or anyone else says can match the experience of this production.  See it through the eye of Christopher yourself.  Take the journey.

Domenick Danza

Monday, April 27, 2015

Airline Highway

Airline Highway
Manhattan Theatre Club
The Samuel J. Friedman Theatre
April 25, 2015

Photo courtesy of Airline Highway
& Manhattan Theatre Club
Airline Highway is a remarkable piece of theatre.  Originally produced at Steppenwolf Theatre in Chicago this past winter, it is now presented on Broadway by the Manhattan Theatre Club.  The production is superbly directed by Joe Mantello, and you MUST experience it.  Each actor in this powerful ensemble serves up a skillfully flawless performance.  The play is impactful.  It pulls you into relationships with a bazaar array of characters that are linked to one another through hardship and bad luck.  The stage overflows with enticing moments, enthralling stories, and engaging conflicts.

Photo courtesy of Airline Highway
& Manhattan Theatre Club
Tanya (Julie White) is throwing a “living funeral” for Miss Ruby (Judith Roberts), and all of her extended family members living at the Hummingbird Motel on Airline Highway in New Orleans will be in attendance.  The Hummingbird is a derelict motel, and its residents are prostitutes, strippers, drug addicts, ex-cons, drunks, and other assorted vagabonds.  The conflict begins when Bait Boy (Joe Tippett), who escaped the dead end life of his once companions, returns for a last visit with Miss Ruby.  He has started a new life in Atlanta with his “sugar momma” and has returned in the company of his teen age “step daughter” Zoe (Carolyn Braver).  The intertwining of relationships and hard-edge conflict runs deep and dirty.  The New Orleans style celebration of life builds to a drunken row in Act II where everything gets ugly, raw, and real.

The script, by Lisa D’Amour, is phenomenal.  She creates an ensemble piece that truly amazes the senses and engulfs the imagination.  D’Amour provides a personal view into the background of each character through Zoe and her ongoing research for a high school sociology report.  She has been assigned to research and observe subcultures.  Throughout the play she interviews each character on how they came to live at the Hummingbird.  Her character becomes an ingenious devise through which the audience is able to begin processing the experience of the play and take in the deeper subjects and stronger moments.  By the time the report is presented at the end of the play, it has become a stunning documentation of an outsider’s insight into this subculture. 

Photo courtesy of Airline Highway & Manhattan Theatre Club
So much comes at the audience so fast, and still amazingly naturalistic, that I want to see it again, or read it, so I can analyze the themes and the messages in more detail.  The essence and value of life.  The economic divide.  The significance of subcultures in a society.  The non-stop and exhausting running when we cannot face the truth about ourselves.  These are all themes that this play explores.  They explode on the stage as the celebration escalates.  It is too much to take in at once, but let the journey begin by experiencing the perspective of this playwright and the insight of this tremendous production. 

Domenick Danza

On a personal note:  It was a great night for conversation with fellow audience members. 

Before the show I had a great conversation with the couple next to me.  They were Manhattan Theatre Club subscribers and had seen a good amount of theatre from this and last season to talk about.  He was a Pediatrician and his wife was a Consumer Report analyst (or researcher). They were originally from Texas and during intermission we discussed the various “subcultures” the play presented, how far we’ve come as a society, and how far we have yet to progress.  They were a pleasant addition to my night out. 

As I was leaving the theatre, I met another couple.  The wife was very disturbed by one line in the play.  One character talked about being “airlifted out”.  This woman was from New Orleans and took that line as a flippant reference to Hurricane Katrina survivors.  She was extremely upset.  Our conversation was short, but to the point.  I asked her what she was upset about because I felt the play treated all the characters and their lifestyles with tremendous dignity.  She agreed and told me that she felt the details in the script and production were extremely accurate. The Hummingbird Motel was based on a Motel in New Orleans.  Miss Ruby and the stripper act she performed in her hey-day was very true to style.   It was that one line that threw her emotionally.  

This play is a kaleidoscope and clearly needs to be processed and discussed.  Specific moments have different meaning for different people, and it is when you share and discuss your reactions that you will realize the richness and true impact of the text and performances.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Ghosts

Ghosts
Almeida Theatre and Sonia Freidman Productions
BAM Harvey Theatre
April 18, 2015

Photo courtesy of BAM Harvey Theatre,
Almeida Theatre & Sonia Freidman Productions
Ahh… Ibsen’s women.  There is no doubt that we can include Helene Alving from Ghosts in that specific category of female characters, alongside Hedda Gabbler and Nora Helmer (A Doll’s House), who risk their wealth and reputation by defying the strict social norm.  There is, however, a certain plunge that Mrs. Alving takes that seems deeper.  Perhaps it is the years of deceit that she has contributed to that makes her more equal to the men at the start of the play.  Perhaps it is how every choice she has made is purposefully decided so to prevent her husband’s sins from affecting her son.  Any way you look at it, the Almeida Theatre and Sonia Freidman Productions’ Ghosts, adapted and directed by Richard Eyre, makes a resilient statement on the inevitability of the ghosts of our past overwhelming our future.

Charlene McKenna and Lesley Manville in Ghosts
Photo courtesy of BAM Harvey Theatre,
Almeida Theatre & Sonia Freidman Productions
When the orphanage Helen Alving (Lesley Manville) donated in honor of her deceased husband is near completion, she reveals the truth about his drinking and womanizing to Pastor Manders (Will Keen).  The intrigue intensifies as they discuss their suppressed, deeper feelings for one another.  Pastor Manders speaks firmly about how the laws of society and the laws of God need to be more than merely perceived as followed.  This theme is put into conflict when juxtaposed against the kept secrets and reality of the characters’ truths.  Helene’s son, Oswald (Billy Howie), returns from Paris and flirts with their housekeeper Regina (Charlene McKenna).  Helene’s statement about how she is more afraid of the ghosts of her past than the retribution of laws of God is brought into a clear focus when she admits that Regina is the illegitimate daughter of her husband, and therefore Oswald’s half-sister.  The plot thickens in complexity, without being soap opera-ish, as only Ibsen can skillfully pull off (fires, blindness from venereal disease, and of course, what Ibsen play is complete without complications due to insurance matters).  The play left me speechless and in awe of concerted storytelling, an effective adaptation, sharp directing, and amazing acting.

Photo courtesy of BAM Harvey Theatre,
Almeida Theatre & Sonia Freidman Productions
The set, designed by Tim Hatley, is unique and simple.  In the foreground is the sitting room.   Through an opaque backdrop the audience is able to see the dining room.  Through another opaque backdrop more upstage, is the exterior of the house.  The design offered a view of each room simultaneously.  The audience sees what goes on behind closed doors, where secrets are kept, unintended for other characters to see or hear.  It also creates a sense of haunting when lit by lamplight.  Peter Mimford’s amazing lighting design sets a mellow and evocative mood, as well as creates a strong sense of the time period, before electric light.

Will Keen, Billy Howie, & Lesley Manville in Ghosts
Photo courtesy of BAM Harey Theatre, Almeida Theatre & Sonia Freidman Productions
When I took my seat and read in the program that the play was 90 minutes without intermission, I was surprised and did not know what to expect.  The Ibsen play is three acts, still this adaptation remarkably tells the penetrating story shadowed with years of remorse and secrets in a concentrated amount of time with a spectacular cast of five.  Kudos to Richard Eyre.  The production is here from London and runs at BAM Harvey Theatre through May 3.  Don’t miss it!

Domenick Danza

Friday, April 17, 2015

Wolf Hall: From Novel to Stage

Wolf Hall
Winter Garden Theatre


Photo courtesy of Wolf Hall
Similar to the seventies Heinz Ketchup commercial that said "Anticipation is making me wait," the stage adaptation for Hilary Mantel's Wolf Hallfor months was making me wait.  For many months, I had eagerly awaited the stage productions at the Winter Garden Theater of Mantel's novels, Wolf Hall and Bring up the Bodies, its sequel.  When I visited London a couple of months ago, I wanted to see the Royal Shakespeare Company, but because of travel time to Stratford, I decided to forgo the trip.  I was familiar with their work as a result of seeing them, in collaboration with another theater company, perform Shakespeare's Anthony and Cleopatra last year. When I read about their pending repertory performance on Broadway, I knew that the quality would be extraordinary. I became so excited about the upcoming performance because I love classical historical drama and because all the shows that I have seen in London have been either captivating or riveting. I expected no less from the Royal Shakespeare Company's production of Wolf Hall

Last week before seeing the stage adaptation of Wolf Hall, I decided to read the novel's first two parts twice to gain a better understanding of all the characters in the story.  Without having a working knowledge of the history, keeping track of all of the characters was proving to be difficult. Upon reading it the second time, the characters became less obscure and much clearer. After reading parts one and two of the novel, Wolf Hall, I watched the first episode of Wolf Hall on PBS.  As a result, I became even more enamored with the text.  I was so enthralled that I googled many of the major players of this historic drama.  I wanted to ensure that I had an accurate understanding of the major historical people and events discussed.  Mantel, in many respects, keeps well in tune with the actual historical events of the life of Henry VIII; however, she refashions Thomas Cromwell to make him much more palatable than the version depicted in A Man For All Seasons (I read that in high school), allowing us to focus less on his malfeasance and more on his fidelity to the King and to Cardinal Wolsey.

Hillary Mantel's novel in two parts tells the story of how Henry VIII requested annulments from both Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn because they were not able to give him a son as heir to the British throne. To help one understand the historical aspect of the story, Henry VIII married Katherine who was his brother's widow.  He claimed that his brother never consummated his marriage and that his brother never touched Katherine, therefore he was free to marry her.  But after eighteen years of marriage, she failed to give him a son that would be heir to the throne.  As a result, he petitioned the Pope, via Cardinal Wolsey, for an annulment.  The pope refused over the protestations of Henry VIII. He married Anne Boleyn anyway and later had her executed for adultery, incest, and treason (she failed to produce a son).  Thomas Cromwell was his "right hand man" who helped the King accomplish his goals of annulment and subsequent marriages, all the while the King never achieved his primary of goal of having a male heir to the throne!  Little did he know that he was to blame!!

The novel was adapted for the stage by Mike Poulton.  Make no mistake, this play focuses on Thomas Cromwell and his relationship to Henry VIII and to Cardinal Wolsey. The other characters are essential, but the play gives great insight into Cromwell's actions in relation to the Catholic Church and in relation to those around him. The play had its original runs in Stratford preceding its run on the West End in London before coming to Broadway. Ben Miles plays loyal Thomas Cromwell, a lawyer, Nathaniel Parker plays King Henry VIII, and Lydia Leonard plays the fearless and shrewd Anne Boleyn, who is later convicted and subsequently beheaded for treason, incest, and adultery -  charges that are historically thought to be false. I saw each part of the play on separate days. The theater appeared to be sold out for the first part, but was only half full for the second part.  Even though the first part ended superbly with the foreshadowing of Jane Seymour, I surmise that either the length of the play or the subject matter deterred people from watching the second part.  The running time for each part is about two hours and forty-five minutes. 

Ben Miles and Lydia Leonard playing Thomas Cromwell  and Anne Boleyn
Photo courtesy of Wolf Hall

Additionally, if one does not know the story of Henry VIII, he or she might have become confused by the twenty-four major characters and by about another twenty minor characters. As a result of reading the novel and watching the PBS Masterpiece series, I understood the content of the play. My suggestion for those who are seeking to see the play is to research some basic history of Henry VIII, Thomas Cromwell, Cardinal Wolsey, Anne Boleyn, Catherine of Aragon, and Jane Seymour. If one knows the key aspects of their lives as they relate to the British monarchy, understanding the play will not be as arduous. If one takes some time to research the history, then disappointment will be unlikely for the acting is superb and the writing keeps one engaged all the while already knowing how the drama is going to unfold and end. Even though I knew the ending, I remained riveted by the story and it maintained my engagement. Lydia Leonard was outstanding in her portrayal of Anne Boleyn. One should see the play for her dramatic portrayal.  Her performance will leave the average theatergoer wanting more from her, yet knowing that the story ends with Jane Seymour, the subsequent wife of the King after Boleyn. Don't be dismayed, rumor has it that part three of this novel is coming! Maybe a drama will follow.

As a result of my prior knowledge of the novel and of British history, I recognized the action and many of the lines of dialogue in the play that were taken directly from the novel. For example, Cromwell discusses that in the Bible there is no mention of purgatory, no pope, no relics, etc.  He also discusses, William Tyndale, a leader in the Protestant Reformation. These references in the play are used as a basis for King Henry VIII forming the Church of England. Because of the enormity of Wolf Hall- nearly six hundred pages, the stage adaptation has only the most salient points of the novel and of British monarchy history.  Without starting from the beginning of the novel, which details Cromwell's humble beginnings, the play periodically hints at Cromwell's beginnings as the son of a blacksmith. The stage adaptation does detail, as the story progresses, the deaths of Cromwell's wife and daughters from sweating sickness as well as the life of his only son. The sentiments of each of the major characters are accurately portrayed.  One can see that Anne Boleyn's shrewdness is depicted accurately as well as the coy and subtle coquettish behavior of Jane Seymour, Henry VIII's third wife. The great adaptation allows us to follow the trajectory of both Cromwell's life as well as Henry's VIII's life and his wives.

Photo courtesy of Wolf Hall
Creatively this dramatic rendering does much with less. The set design features high cement towers that serves many purposes.  The lighting design and sound designed helps the audience to determine the actual location of each scene.  At times, the play is set on the Thames River. The sound of the water as the characters are on the boat gives a strong sense of location.  Other times, the characters are indoors and there is often a fireplace that gives us understanding of the location. The scenes at the Tower of London where Anne Boleyn and others were beheaded is dark and has a sinister atmosphere. The creative team does a splendid performance in its decisions of costume design. The costumes in the play are reminiscent of both the fifteenth and the sixteenth century. The costumes help one to be able to distinguish the characters from each other. Their power and their wealth were both displayed through their clothing. During sixteenth century England, velvet, wool and silk became sought after fabrics. The play's costume fabrics are elegant and display the opulence of the monarchy. The hats that they wear also depict the era.

Although this play does not have many special effects, its strength lies in the writing and in the acting that are used to maintain your interest. Sometimes, plays use many techniques to either make a production greater or to mask otherwise weak productions; but, this production is great at its core without all the possible technology and elaborate set design. It's set in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, a time when all of the advances were not on the horizon. There are no anachronisms that are out of tune with the setting of this historical drama. Perhaps in the future, we will see more dramas like this.

Please get your tickets to Wolf Hall- both parts!  This is a limited run of fifteen weeks. Even if you believe that the play will be difficult, watching this historical drama will not likely leave you disappointed.  You will be both engrossed and educated at the same time. Why not give it a try! As I finish this post, the PBS drama awaits me! Yes, I still want to watch the drama unfold, even though I know the entire story.  The reviews for that series have been on par with Downton Abbey. What can I say? I love both great writing and great theater.

Starting in July, Lin Manuel Miranda's Hamilton, a historical musical, will be appearing on Broadway after a successful run at the Public Theater in New York City.  I was dilatory in getting a ticket and I have had no success at the Public's ticket lottery.  I hope to get a ticket for this upcoming Broadway production. I'm expecting it to be as great as Wolf Hall. Reputation is everything! Comments welcome.

Deirdre M. DeLoatch
Guest Contributor